Hello!
> The need to add num_irq to this prototype reveals the ugliness
> of it as an interface.
> I don't think we gain much by making these two functions common,
> and we do get a lot of churn in the existing code below.
You know, i was also thinking about it. And actually there is a way to
On 10 August 2015 at 13:06, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> These functions are useful also for vGICv3 implementation. Make them
> accessible
> from within other modules.
>
> Actually kvm_dist_get() and kvm_dist_put() could also be made reusable, but
> they would require two extra parameters (s->dev_fd and
These functions are useful also for vGICv3 implementation. Make them accessible
from within other modules.
Actually kvm_dist_get() and kvm_dist_put() could also be made reusable, but
they would require two extra parameters (s->dev_fd and s->num_cpu) as well as
lots of typecasts of 's' to DeviceSta
