On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, at 10:45 AM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > As such an implementation of lstat that uses statx will be broken.
> >
> > Since fstatat exists since 2.6.16 this can be reduced to a call to fstatat.
>
> I am not sure what you meant here. I think QEMU lstat() implementation
> do
> From: Timothy Baldwin
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 9:48 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 81/87] linux-user: Add support for statx() syscall for
> all platforms
>
> On 13/08/18 18:53, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > From: Aleksandar Rikalo
> >
> > Implement support for translation of system ca
On 13/08/18 18:53, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
From: Aleksandar Rikalo
Implement support for translation of system call statx(). The
implementation includes invoking other (more mature) syscalls
(from the same 'stat' family) on the host side. This way,
problems of availability of statx() on the
From: Aleksandar Rikalo
Implement support for translation of system call statx(). The
implementation includes invoking other (more mature) syscalls
(from the same 'stat' family) on the host side. This way,
problems of availability of statx() on the host side are
avoided.
Signed-off-by: Aleksanda
