Le 11/02/2018 à 18:47, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> We properly computed the capped mask size to be put to the application
> buffer, but didn't actually used it. Also, we need to return the capped mask
> size instead of 0 on success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
Le 11/02/2018 à 18:47, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> We properly computed the capped mask size to be put to the application
> buffer, but didn't actually used it. Also, we need to return the capped mask
> size instead of 0 on success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
We properly computed the capped mask size to be put to the application
buffer, but didn't actually used it. Also, we need to return the capped mask
size instead of 0 on success.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
Difference from v1:
- simplify fix
---