On 01/03/2012 11:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/03/2012 07:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/03/2012 07:09 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
(strange, I was 100% sure I tested Xen).
Ah, we have different CONFIG_XEN_CTRL_INTERFACE_VERSIONs.
Updated branch pushed - changed the signature of an empty-bodied
On 01/03/2012 07:16 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 07:09 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > (strange, I was 100% sure I tested Xen).
> >
>
> Ah, we have different CONFIG_XEN_CTRL_INTERFACE_VERSIONs.
>
Updated branch pushed - changed the signature of an empty-bodied
function, should be safe.
git:/
On 01/03/2012 07:09 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> (strange, I was 100% sure I tested Xen).
>
Ah, we have different CONFIG_XEN_CTRL_INTERFACE_VERSIONs.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On 01/03/2012 07:06 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 12/27/2011 09:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> Changes since first posting: fold a fixup patch into its parent patch,
>> style fixes.
>>
>> I didn't get much review or testing for vhost or Xen, due to various
>> issues around births separated by a larg
On 12/27/2011 09:38 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Changes since first posting: fold a fixup patch into its parent patch,
style fixes.
I didn't get much review or testing for vhost or Xen, due to various
issues around births separated by a large amount of time if not
distance, but I don't want to get thi
Changes since first posting: fold a fixup patch into its parent patch,
style fixes.
I didn't get much review or testing for vhost or Xen, due to various
issues around births separated by a large amount of time if not
distance, but I don't want to get this series to get stale. Given that
both are
