Quoting Eduardo Habkost (2014-09-18 12:27:12)
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:29:47AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> > Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (2014-09-14 13:41:23)
> > > From: Eduardo Habkost
> > >
> > > There are multiple reasons for running the global property tests on a
> > > subprocess:
> > >
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 07:06:16PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/09/2014 18:29, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> >
> >
> >> > int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> > {
> >> > g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
> >> > @@ -174,9 +200,20 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> > type_regist
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:29:47AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (2014-09-14 13:41:23)
> > From: Eduardo Habkost
> >
> > There are multiple reasons for running the global property tests on a
> > subprocess:
> >
> > * We need the global_props lists to be empty for each t
Il 18/09/2014 18:29, Michael Roth ha scritto:
>
>
>> > int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> > {
>> > g_test_init(&argc, &argv, NULL);
>> > @@ -174,9 +200,20 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> > type_register_static(&static_prop_type);
>> > type_register_static(&dynamic_prop_type
Quoting Michael S. Tsirkin (2014-09-14 13:41:23)
> From: Eduardo Habkost
>
> There are multiple reasons for running the global property tests on a
> subprocess:
>
> * We need the global_props lists to be empty for each test case, so
> global properties from the previous test won't affect the n
From: Eduardo Habkost
There are multiple reasons for running the global property tests on a
subprocess:
* We need the global_props lists to be empty for each test case, so
global properties from the previous test won't affect the next one;
* We don't want the qdev_prop_check_global() warnings
