From: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru>
There is no reason to limit sigaltstack syscall to just a few
architectures and pretend it is not implemented for others.
If some architecture is not ready for this, that architecture
should be fixed instead.
This fixes LP#1516408.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index ff20ea7..d1eb3eb 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -8503,14 +8503,8 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long
arg1,
break;
}
case TARGET_NR_sigaltstack:
-#if defined(TARGET_I386) || defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_MIPS) || \
- defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_ALPHA) || \
- defined(TARGET_M68K) || defined(TARGET_S390X) || defined(TARGET_OPENRISC)
ret = do_sigaltstack(arg1, arg2, get_sp_from_cpustate((CPUArchState
*)cpu_env));
break;
-#else
- goto unimplemented;
-#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SENDFILE
case TARGET_NR_sendfile:
--
2.6.4
