From: Timothy E Baldwin <t.e.baldwi...@members.leeds.ac.uk>
Fix races between signal handling and the pause syscall by
reimplementing it using block_signals() and sigsuspend().
(Using safe_syscall(pause) would also work, except that the
pause syscall doesn't exist on all architectures.)
Signed-off-by: Timothy Edward Baldwin <t.e.baldwi...@members.leeds.ac.uk>
Message-id: 1441497448-32489-28-git-send-email-t.e.baldwi...@members.leeds.ac.uk
[PMM: tweaked commit message]
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@linaro.org>
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index 639b328..aa5517c 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -7059,7 +7059,10 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long
arg1,
#endif
#ifdef TARGET_NR_pause /* not on alpha */
case TARGET_NR_pause:
- ret = get_errno(pause());
+ if (!block_signals()) {
+ sigsuspend(&((TaskState *)cpu->opaque)->signal_mask);
+ }
+ ret = -TARGET_EINTR;
break;
#endif
#ifdef TARGET_NR_utime
--
2.1.4
