On 01/26/2017 04:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I haven't studied the code much, so I'm just reporting what Coverity
says. Not sure if the code has a bug or can just be simplified.
It looks like it can be simplified.
I'm sure at one point in the development, "which" was not a constant like
I haven't studied the code much, so I'm just reporting what Coverity
says. Not sure if the code has a bug or can just be simplified.
On 23/01/2017 03:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> +/* Emit a conditional branch to a direct target. If the branch itself
> + is nullified, we should have already
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target/hppa/translate.c | 477
1 file changed, 477 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/hppa/translate.c b/target/hppa/translate.c
index 2ad651c..1d0976f 100644
--- a/target/hppa/translate.c
+++