On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:09:07 +0800
Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 06:56 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:23:31 +0800
> > Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/31/2016 05:20 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:24:46 +0200
> >>> "Michael S. Tsirkin"
On 10/31/2016 06:56 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:23:31 +0800
Xiao Guangrong wrote:
On 10/31/2016 05:20 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:24:46 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
From: Xiao Guangrong
According to ACPI 6.0 spec, "Memory Device Physical Ad
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016 17:23:31 +0800
Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 10/31/2016 05:20 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:24:46 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> >> From: Xiao Guangrong
> >>
> >> According to ACPI 6.0 spec, "Memory Device Physical Address
> >> Region Base"
On 10/31/2016 05:20 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:24:46 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
From: Xiao Guangrong
According to ACPI 6.0 spec, "Memory Device Physical Address
Region Base" in memdev is defined as "This field provides the
Device Physical Address base of the re
On Sun, 30 Oct 2016 23:24:46 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong
>
> According to ACPI 6.0 spec, "Memory Device Physical Address
> Region Base" in memdev is defined as "This field provides the
> Device Physical Address base of the region". This field should
> be zero in ou
From: Xiao Guangrong
According to ACPI 6.0 spec, "Memory Device Physical Address
Region Base" in memdev is defined as "This field provides the
Device Physical Address base of the region". This field should
be zero in our case
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signe
