On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:12:48 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Igor Mammedov
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:08:54 +0530
> > Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> > From: Bharata B Rao
> >> >
> >> > Cu
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:08:54 +0530
> Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> > From: Bharata B Rao
>> >
>> > Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
>> > cre
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:08:54 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > From: Bharata B Rao
> >
> > Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> > created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> From: Bharata B Rao
>
> Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
> created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
> index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This i
From: Bharata B Rao
Currently CPUState::cpu_index is monotonically increasing and a newly
created CPU always gets the next higher index. The next available
index is calculated by counting the existing number of CPUs. This is
fine as long as we only add CPUs, but there are architectures which
are
