On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Pooja Dhannawat wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 03/12/2016 03:23 AM, Pooja Dhannawat wrote:
>> > As only DEPTH ==32 case is used, removing other dead code
>> > which is based on DEPTH !== 32
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Pooja
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/12/2016 03:23 AM, Pooja Dhannawat wrote:
> > As only DEPTH ==32 case is used, removing other dead code
> > which is based on DEPTH !== 32
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pooja Dhannawat
> > ---
>
> > +++ b/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c
> > @@ -71,44 +71
On 03/12/2016 03:23 AM, Pooja Dhannawat wrote:
> As only DEPTH ==32 case is used, removing other dead code
> which is based on DEPTH !== 32
>
> Signed-off-by: Pooja Dhannawat
> ---
> +++ b/hw/display/omap_lcdc.c
> @@ -71,44 +71,23 @@ static void omap_lcd_interrupts(struct omap_lcd_panel_s
> *s)
As only DEPTH ==32 case is used, removing other dead code
which is based on DEPTH !== 32
Signed-off-by: Pooja Dhannawat
---
hw/display/omap_lcd_template.h | 10 ++
hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 21 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/h
