On 4 March 2016 at 15:03, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
> Do we really need to rearrange the code?
> In pseudo-code the level is set explicitly as well, in case of a fault.
That's why when I originally brought the point up I said
"but I'm not sure it's worth rearranging that code"...
If you want to neate
03.03.2016, 19:54, "Peter Maydell" :
> On 3 March 2016 at 16:37, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 03.03.2016 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Yes, this patch is definitely fixing a bug; I'm just mentioning that other
>>> code path because it seems to be the result of previously fixing the bug
>
On 3 March 2016 at 16:37, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 03.03.2016 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Yes, this patch is definitely fixing a bug; I'm just mentioning that other
>> code path because it seems to be the result of previously fixing the bug
>> for a particular special case...
>>
>>
>
> Ah, ri
On 03.03.2016 17:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 March 2016 at 14:48, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 03.03.2016 16:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2016 at 19:19, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
> Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of
On 3 March 2016 at 14:48, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
> On 03.03.2016 16:49, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 2 March 2016 at 19:19, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>>> On 02.03.2016 21:04, Sergey Sorokin wrote:
Qemu reports translation fault on 1st level instead of 0th level in case of
AArch64 address trans
