[Reviving an old series]
On 5/3/18 8:36 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Fri 27 Apr 2018 05:43:33 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
-static int bdrv_rw_co(BdrvChild *child, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf,
- int nb_sectors, bool is_write, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
-{
-QEMUIOVector
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 08:43:05AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> byte-based. Now that all callers of blocking I/O have been converted
> to use our preferred byte-based bdrv_p{read,write}(), we can
> delete the unused bdrv_{read,writ
On Fri 27 Apr 2018 05:43:33 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> -static int bdrv_rw_co(BdrvChild *child, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf,
>>> - int nb_sectors, bool is_write, BdrvRequestFlags
>>> flags)
>>> -{
>>> -QEMUIOVector qiov;
>>> -struct iovec iov = {
>>> -
On 04/27/2018 09:01 AM, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 26 Apr 2018 03:43:05 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
>> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
>> byte-based. Now that all callers of blocking I/O have been converted
>> to use our preferred byte-based bdrv_p{read,write}
On Thu 26 Apr 2018 03:43:05 PM CEST, Eric Blake wrote:
> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> byte-based. Now that all callers of blocking I/O have been converted
> to use our preferred byte-based bdrv_p{read,write}(), we can
> delete the unused bdrv_{read,write}().
