On Thu, 06/01 14:26, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:57:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 05/31 10:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:18:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 05/11 15:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 201
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 05:57:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 05/31 10:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:18:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Thu, 05/11 15:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:43:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > > What
On Wed, 05/31 10:39, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:18:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 05/11 15:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:43:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > What's done in the source's context change notifier is moving the
> > > >
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 10:18:44AM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 05/11 15:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:43:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > What's done in the source's context change notifier is moving the
> > > target's context to follow the new one, so we request
On Thu, 05/11 15:41, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:43:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > What's done in the source's context change notifier is moving the
> > target's context to follow the new one, so we request this permission
> > here.
>
> It's true that the backup block job
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 05:43:46PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> What's done in the source's context change notifier is moving the
> target's context to follow the new one, so we request this permission
> here.
It's true that the backup block job must be able to set target's
AioContext, but does this
