On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 03:30:28PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> The function sector_limits_lun2qemu() returns a value in units of
> the block layer's 512-byte sector, and can be as large as
> 0x40000000, which is much larger than the block layer's inherent
> limit of BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS.  The block layer already
> handles '0' as a synonym to the inherent limit, and it is nicer
> to return this value than it is to calculate an arbitrary
> maximum, for two reasons: we want to ensure that the block layer
> continues to special-case '0' as 'no limit beyond the inherent
> limits'; and we want to be able to someday expand the block
> layer to allow 64-bit limits, where auditing for uses of
> BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_SECTORS will help us make sure we aren't
> artificially constraining iscsi to old block layer limits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v2: new patch
> ---
>  block/iscsi.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to