On 05/01/2018 08:39 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:20:11AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 04/26/2018 08:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 04/17/2018 09:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> In
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:20:11AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 04/26/2018 08:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> >> On 04/17/2018 09:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> In cpu_ppc_set_papr() the UPRT and GTSE bits of the LPCR are
On 04/26/2018 08:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> On 04/17/2018 09:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> In cpu_ppc_set_papr() the UPRT and GTSE bits of the LPCR are initialized
>>> based on on ppc64_radix_guest(). Which seems reasonable,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:52:18AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 04/17/2018 09:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > In cpu_ppc_set_papr() the UPRT and GTSE bits of the LPCR are initialized
> > based on on ppc64_radix_guest(). Which seems reasonable, except that
> > ppc64_radix_guest() is based on
On 04/17/2018 09:17 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> In cpu_ppc_set_papr() the UPRT and GTSE bits of the LPCR are initialized
> based on on ppc64_radix_guest(). Which seems reasonable, except that
> ppc64_radix_guest() is based on spapr->patb_entry which is only set up
> in spapr_machine_reset, called
