On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 05:30:23PM +1100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/24/2017 03:50 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > Although I guess they'd shrink right down again if we put an
> > env->xer_mask in. Thoughts on that option Richard?
>
> Why would xer_mask shrink the code? I can't see that we'd b
On 24 February 2017 at 04:23, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:34:32AM +1100, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 02/23/2017 05:40 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
>> > Richard Henderson writes:
>> > > These functions are becoming quite large. Are they performance critical
>> > > enough
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 06:11:30AM +0530, Nikunj Dadhania wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 04:23, David Gibson
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:34:32AM +1100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >> On 02/23/2017 05:40 PM, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> >> > Richard Henderson writes:
> >> > > These func
On 02/24/2017 03:50 PM, David Gibson wrote:
Although I guess they'd shrink right down again if we put an
env->xer_mask in. Thoughts on that option Richard?
Why would xer_mask shrink the code? I can't see that we'd be able to eliminate
any code using the mask.
r~
