mdroth writes:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 01:36:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Would this make sense for -stable? Impact is modest: fix a rather
>> obscure feature of x86 targets on bigendian hosts, and improve error
>> messages around it). On the other hand, the patches look pretty saf
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 01:36:04PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Would this make sense for -stable? Impact is modest: fix a rather
> obscure feature of x86 targets on bigendian hosts, and improve error
> messages around it). On the other hand, the patches look pretty safe to
> me.
5/6 was ce
