20.03.2014 19:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
No, please don't; this needs to be done for new machine types only.
I thought about
On Do, 2014-03-20 at 10:58 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
So what should we do then? Should I send an updated patch which sets
070002 in the multiport case too?
Yes, that would be great.
cheers,
Gerd
On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Do, 2014-03-20 at 10:58 +0100, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
So what should we do then? Should I send an updated patch which sets
070002 in the multiport case too?
Yes, that would be great.
OK, I'll resubmit it after pc-2.1 is added also with the
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
C 07 Communication controller
00 Serial controller
00 8250
01 16450
02 16550
What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if
like this?
I'm not completely sure what the correct
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
/mjt
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
No, please don't; this needs to be done for new machine types only.
Paolo
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
No, please don't; this needs to be done for new machine types only.
Why? I tried
Il 20/03/2014 17:01, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to -trivial.
No, please don't; this needs to
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 17:01, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 20/03/2014 16:42, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
Thanks, applied to
Il 20/03/2014 17:58, BALATON Zoltan ha scritto:
Classes (or anything guest-visible in fact) must never ever be changed
for the same machine type. It's a rule.
The class did not change only the prog interface field after it (which
is guest visible but I think most guests just ignore it). So
C 07 Communication controller
00 Serial controller
00 8250
01 16450
02 16550
What about multi_serial_pci_init() -- should it too set prog-if
like this?
I'm not completely sure what the correct value should be for
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan bala...@eik.bme.hu
---
hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/char/serial-pci.c
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Michael Tokarev wrote:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan bala...@eik.bme.hu
---
hw/char/serial-pci.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Michael Tokarev wrote:
10.03.2014 22:40, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Ping!
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/324674/
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan bala...@eik.bme.hu
---
hw/char/serial-pci.c
14 matches
Mail list logo
