I have sent a v2 of this patch (renaming it, with a description and a
test case). If it's not trivial and I have to send it in another way,
I will do so.
Sorry for the inconvenience, as I said I'm new here and maybe I
misunderstood the "trivial" category.
> Changes which require knowledge of a specific device model are often not
> trivial to anyone who hasn't studied the specification. So if the patch
> requires background knowledge of ppc ABI, hardware registers, etc then
> it's usually best sent to relevant subsystem maintainer (see
> ./MAINTAINE
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:00:49PM +0100, Alex Barcelo wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 19:43, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 09.02.2012 19:30, schrieb Alex Barcelo:
> > The patch should describe what it touches
> > (linux-user), what it does, what for and make clear why that is correct.
> > Is there
