On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:28:12PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Would you like me to send this for a 4th time or are you OK with me
> pulling this through my tree with Marcel's R-b? Thanks,
>
> Alex
Sorry, keep forgetting about it.
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:06:03 -0700
Hi Michael,
Would you like me to send this for a 4th time or are you OK with me
pulling this through my tree with Marcel's R-b? Thanks,
Alex
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 16:06:03 -0700
Alex Williamson wrote:
> A conventional PCI bus does not support config space accesses above
> the standard 256 byt
On 01/19/2016 06:38 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:54 +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 01/19/2016 01:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
A conventional PCI bus does not support config space accesses above
the standard 256 byte configuration space. PCIe-to-PCI bridges are
not pe
On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 10:54 +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 01/19/2016 01:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > A conventional PCI bus does not support config space accesses above
> > the standard 256 byte configuration space. PCIe-to-PCI bridges are
> > not permitted to forward transactions if th
On 01/19/2016 01:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
A conventional PCI bus does not support config space accesses above
the standard 256 byte configuration space. PCIe-to-PCI bridges are
not permitted to forward transactions if the extended register address
field is non-zero and must handle it as an
A conventional PCI bus does not support config space accesses above
the standard 256 byte configuration space. PCIe-to-PCI bridges are
not permitted to forward transactions if the extended register address
field is non-zero and must handle it as an unsupported request (PCIe
bridge spec rev 1.0, 4.
