On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 23:36 +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>
> After another run of the OpenBIOS tests with this patch applied on top
> of the previous 2 patches, I see no regressions introduced. Like Cédric
> I don't get the feeling that the Mac machines necessarily run faster,
> however the over
On 06/06/16 11:23, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This ports the existing 64-bit mechanism to 32-bit, thus series
> of 64 tlbie's followed by a sync like some versions of Darwin
> (ab)use will result in a single flush.
>
> We apply a pending flush on any sync instruction though, as Darwin
> does
On 06/06/2016 12:23 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This ports the existing 64-bit mechanism to 32-bit, thus series
> of 64 tlbie's followed by a sync like some versions of Darwin
> (ab)use will result in a single flush.
>
> We apply a pending flush on any sync instruction though, as Darwin
>
This ports the existing 64-bit mechanism to 32-bit, thus series
of 64 tlbie's followed by a sync like some versions of Darwin
(ab)use will result in a single flush.
We apply a pending flush on any sync instruction though, as Darwin
doesn't use tlbsync on non-SMP systems.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin H
