On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 05.12.2012 20:58, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori
wrote:
>
> P
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.12.2012 20:28, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> What was committed post hard freeze that's not a
>>> bug fix?
>>
>> d3067b0 Documentation: Update image format information
>> a13e5e0 Doc
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Blue Swirl writes:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori
wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell
Am 05.12.2012 20:58, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori
>>> wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue
Am 05.12.2012 20:28, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> What was committed post hard freeze that's not a
>> bug fix?
>
> d3067b0 Documentation: Update image format information
> a13e5e0 Documentation: Update block cache mode information
> 044d003 qemu
Blue Swirl writes:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori
>>> wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Peter Maydell writes:
>>>
On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>
> The definition of the hard f
Hi,
On 12/05/2012 08:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Peter Maydell writes:
On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
The definition of the hard freeze bothers me. A few patches that went
in after 1.3-rc0 were not bug fixes but just new fe
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> The definition of the hard freeze bothers me. A few patches that went
>>> in after 1.3-rc0 were not bug fixes but just new features, so the
>>> difference between
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> The definition of the hard freeze bothers me. A few patches that went
>> in after 1.3-rc0 were not bug fixes but just new features, so the
>> difference between soft and hard freezes was not clear.
>
> My vote for this would
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> The definition of the hard freeze bothers me. A few patches that went
>> in after 1.3-rc0 were not bug fixes but just new features, so the
>> difference between soft and hard freezes was not clea
On 4 December 2012 18:38, Blue Swirl wrote:
> The definition of the hard freeze bothers me. A few patches that went
> in after 1.3-rc0 were not bug fixes but just new features, so the
> difference between soft and hard freezes was not clear.
My vote for this would be to adhere to our definition
a
On 3 December 2012 21:30, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I've put up a strawman schedule on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/1.4
The definition of 'soft freeze' on this page ("Major features
should have initial code committed") and the definition on
the page http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/Sof
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Based on popular demand, I'd like to continue with a 3-month release
> cycle for the foreseeable future. One thing I'd like to "fix" though is
> to avoid major holidays during the -rc cycles.
>
> The best cycle I can figure is:
>
mu-devel-
>> bounces+ericj=mips@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Liguori
>> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 1:30 PM
>> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] 1.4 release schedule
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Based on popular demand, I'
2012 1:30 PM
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] 1.4 release schedule
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Based on popular demand, I'd like to continue with a 3-month release
> cycle for the foreseeable future. One thing I'd like to "fix" though is
> t
Hi,
Based on popular demand, I'd like to continue with a 3-month release
cycle for the foreseeable future. One thing I'd like to "fix" though is
to avoid major holidays during the -rc cycles.
The best cycle I can figure is:
Feb 15th
May 15th
Aug 15th
Nov 15th
To get us onto this schedule, we'
17 matches
Mail list logo
