On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:49:30 +0100
Igor Mammedov wrote:
> For sPAPR it would be:
>
> device_add socket-type,core=X
typo here, should be:
device_add core-type,core=X
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
[...]
> > > > > i.e. completely split interface from how boards internally implement
> > > > > CPU hotplug.
> > > >
> > > > A QOM-based interface may still split the interface from how
> > > > boards internally implement CPU hotplu
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:19:21 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:52:06 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:52:06 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:20 -0300
> > > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 23,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:52:06 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:20 -0300
> > Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 1
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:12:26 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:43:05PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:25:43 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:54:1
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 01:43:05PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:25:43 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:54:17 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:20 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > This is why Edu
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:25:43 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:54:17 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:3
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:03:21 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:51:19 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > David Gibson writes:
>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:17:54PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:54:17 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:03:41PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:51:19 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > David Gibson writes:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05:54AM +0100, Markus Armbrust
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 03:42:18PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:20 -0300
> Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > This is why Edu
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:20 -0300
Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
> > > This is why Eduardo suggested - and I agreed - that it's probably
> > > better to implement th
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:54:17 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:49:11PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:38:4
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 22:26:04 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:05:10 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:52:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:48:3
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 09:53:33 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Igor Mammedov writes:
>
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
> >> This is why Eduardo suggested - and I agreed - that it's probably
> >> better to implement the "1st layer" as an internal structur
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:05:10 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:52:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:48:34 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:51:19 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > David Gibson writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >> David Gibson writes:
> > >>
> > >> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:42:10AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> David Gibson writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> David Gibson write
Igor Mammedov writes:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
[...]
>> This is why Eduardo suggested - and I agreed - that it's probably
>> better to implement the "1st layer" as an internal structure/interface
>> only, and implement the 2nd layer on top of that. When/if we n
David Gibson writes:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> David Gibson writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> David Gibson writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:49:11PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:38:48 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
> > > CCing thread a couple of
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 06:26:20PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> [...]
> > > This is why Eduardo suggested - and I agreed - that it's probably
> > > better to implement
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:05:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> David Gibson writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:46:45AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
[...]
> > This is why Eduardo suggested - and I agreed - that it's probably
> > better to implement the "1st layer" as an internal structure/interface
> > only, and implement t
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:54:32 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:49:11PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:38:48 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > CCing thread a couple of libvirt guys.
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mamme
David Gibson writes:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> David Gibson writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
>> >> David Gibson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:49:11PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:38:48 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> CCing thread a couple of libvirt guys.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
> > > David Gibson w
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:51:11AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
> >> David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wro
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:51:11 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> David Gibson writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
> >> David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrot
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:38:48 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
CCing thread a couple of libvirt guys.
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrot
David Gibson writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
>> David Gibson wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
>> > > Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:37:39AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> > > Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > >
> > > > Igor Mammedov w
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:05:10 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:52:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:48:34 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:43:41PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > Igor Mammedov writes:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:39:52 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> > Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> > > Igor Mammedov writes:
> > >
> > > > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hot
David Gibson writes:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:35:42PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Igor Mammedov writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
>> > Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >
>> >> Igor Mammedov writes:
>> >>
>> >> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotpl
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:35:42PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Igor Mammedov writes:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> > Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >
> >> Igor Mammedov writes:
> >>
> >> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> >> > it is required fro
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:52:42AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:48:34 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:43:41PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > Igor Mammedov writes:
> > >
> > > > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotp
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> > Igor Mammedov writes:
> >
> > > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:36:55AM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Igor Mammedov writes:
> >
> > > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> >
Andreas Färber writes:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Igor Mammedov writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
>>> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>
Igor Mammedov writes:
> it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> it is req
Am 16.02.2016 um 13:35 schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Igor Mammedov writes:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
>> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>>> Igor Mammedov writes:
>>>
it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
it is required from a target platform that wi
Igor Mammedov writes:
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Igor Mammedov writes:
>>
>> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
>> > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
>> > command to set board specific MachineCl
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:48:34 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:43:41PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Igor Mammedov writes:
> >
> > > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> >
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 20:43:41 +0100
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Igor Mammedov writes:
>
> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> > command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() hook,
> > whic
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:43:41PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Igor Mammedov writes:
>
> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> > command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() hook,
> >
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:44:00 -0700
Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/15/2016 10:10 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> > it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> > command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() ho
Igor Mammedov writes:
> it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() hook,
> which will return a list of possible CPUs with options
> that would be needed
On 02/15/2016 10:10 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
> it is required from a target platform that wish to support
> command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() hook,
> which will return a list of possible CPUs with options
>
it will allow mgmt to query present and possible to hotplug CPUs
it is required from a target platform that wish to support
command to set board specific MachineClass.possible_cpus() hook,
which will return a list of possible CPUs with options
that would be needed for hotplugging possible CPUs.
Fo
51 matches
Mail list logo