On 06/04/15 17:18, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 06/04/2015 04:04 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 06/04/15 11:42, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>>> On 06/04/2015 02:11 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
What element type do you propose for the array in the new fw_cfg file?
(And what name for the fw_cfg fi
On 06/04/2015 04:04 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 06/04/15 11:42, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 06/04/2015 02:11 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
What element type do you propose for the array in the new fw_cfg file?
(And what name for the fw_cfg file itself?)
"etc/extra-pci-roots" uses uint64_t, little en
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 03:04:15PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/04/15 11:42, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On 06/04/2015 02:11 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
> >> What element type do you propose for the array in the new fw_cfg file?
> >> (And what name for the fw_cfg file itself?)
> >>
> >> "etc/e
On 06/04/15 11:42, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 06/04/2015 02:11 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> What element type do you propose for the array in the new fw_cfg file?
>> (And what name for the fw_cfg file itself?)
>>
>> "etc/extra-pci-roots" uses uint64_t, little endian, for the number of
>> extra roo
On 06/04/2015 02:11 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 06/03/15 22:34, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
On 06/03/2015 01:20 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Maybe we can experiment some more; for example we could start by
you explaining to me how exactly to probe for a root bus's presence
(you mentioned device 0, but
On 06/03/15 22:34, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 01:20 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Maybe we can experiment some more; for example we could start by
>> you explaining to me how exactly to probe for a root bus's presence
>> (you mentioned device 0, but I'll need more than that).
> Well, I
