less we have this feature?
>
> Best regards,
> Pankaj
This feature is unused by vhost ATM.
> > From: "Jason Wang"
> > To: "Pankaj Gupta"
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
> > stefa...@redhat.com, aligu...@amazon.co
uot;
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
> stefa...@redhat.com, aligu...@amazon.com
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 8:11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] net: 'Remove vhostforce option in
> additionto vhost param'
>
>
>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Pankaj Gupta
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> > guest don't have MSI-X support.
> > Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
> > like DPDK and s
>
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > > vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> > > guest don't have MSI-X support.
> > > Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
> > > like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
> > > guests wit
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> > guest don't have MSI-X support.
> > Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
> > like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
> > guests without MSI-X suppo
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:50:05AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
> guest don't have MSI-X support.
> Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
> like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
> guests without MSI-X support is getting
vhostforce was added to enable use of vhost when
guest don't have MSI-X support.
Now, we have scenarios which dont use interrupts
like DPDK and still use vhost. Also, performance of
guests without MSI-X support is getting less popular.
Its ok to remove this extra option and enable vhost
on
