Am 11.03.2013 um 19:03 hat Ján Tomko geschrieben:
> On 03/04/2013 04:40 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2013 um 16:19 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> >> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not talking about the QEMU cli, but about qcow2 as the format
On 03/04/2013 04:40 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.03.2013 um 16:19 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not talking about the QEMU cli, but about qcow2 as the format as
>>> defined in the spec (which just happens to sit in qe
Am 04.03.2013 um 16:19 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2013 um 15:46 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 04.03.2013 um 15:27 hat Daniel P. Berr
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 04:05:50PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.03.2013 um 15:46 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 04.03.2013 um 15:27 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:04:53PM +0100,
Am 04.03.2013 um 15:46 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2013 um 15:27 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > > Am 04.03.2013 um 14:09 hat Daniel P. Berr
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.03.2013 um 15:27 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 04.03.2013 um 14:09 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > > I think it makes much more sense to deal wi
Am 04.03.2013 um 15:27 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.03.2013 um 14:09 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > > > Before posting another version of my patch
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:04:53PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.03.2013 um 14:09 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > > Before posting another version of my patches [1], attempting to add
> > > support for the new qcow format to
Am 04.03.2013 um 14:09 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > Before posting another version of my patches [1], attempting to add
> > support for the new qcow format to libvirt, I would like to know if this
> > sounds reasonable:
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Ján Tomko wrote:
> Before posting another version of my patches [1], attempting to add
> support for the new qcow format to libvirt, I would like to know if this
> sounds reasonable:
>
> A new format named 'qcow3' would be added, along with a
> sub-elemen
Before posting another version of my patches [1], attempting to add
support for the new qcow format to libvirt, I would like to know if this
sounds reasonable:
A new format named 'qcow3' would be added, along with a
sub-element for target.
qcow3test
8
/var/lib/libvirt/images/qc
11 matches
Mail list logo