Hi All,
Any objections to a tree wide:
s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt
FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API,
in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_. It buys
back a previous 4 chars, in line length, with line length being an
obstacle to adding _nofail
On 11.07.2013, at 09:56, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
Hi All,
Any objections to a tree wide:
s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt
FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API,
in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_. It buys
back a previous 4 chars, in line
On 11 July 2013 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote:
Hi All,
Any objections to a tree wide:
s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt
No objection from me...
FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API,
in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_.