[Qemu-devel] [RFC] s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt

2013-07-11 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
Hi All, Any objections to a tree wide: s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API, in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_. It buys back a previous 4 chars, in line length, with line length being an obstacle to adding _nofail

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt

2013-07-11 Thread Alexander Graf
On 11.07.2013, at 09:56, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: Hi All, Any objections to a tree wide: s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API, in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_. It buys back a previous 4 chars, in line

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt

2013-07-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On 11 July 2013 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi All, Any objections to a tree wide: s/qemu_devtree/qemu_fdt No objection from me... FWIU, the qemu_ prefix is supposed to indicate a wrapping of an API, in this case that API clearly being fdt_ not devtree_.