On 2012年01月04日 03:28, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:49:47 +0800
Osier Yangjy...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011年06月04日 03:03, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:49:47 +0800
Osier Yang jy...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011年06月04日 03:03, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
we need to fix the eject
On 2011年06月04日 03:03, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
we need to fix the eject command and maybe introduce new commands first.
Here's a my proposal.
This
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
we need to fix the eject command and maybe introduce new commands first.
Here's a my proposal.
On Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:31:35 +0200
Markus Armbruster arm...@redhat.com wrote:
Luiz Capitulino lcapitul...@redhat.com writes:
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
we need to fix
In a recent discussion on the mailing list regarding the introduction of
the BLOCK_TRAY_OPEN and BLOCK_TRAY_CLOSE events[1], it was mentioned that
we need to fix the eject command and maybe introduce new commands first.
Here's a my proposal.
This series introduces three new commands:
o
