On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 12.04.2013 um 14:06 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Il 12/04/2013 12:04, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> >> Or actually, if you want to avoid .bdrv_drain for now, the patch that I
>>
Am 12.04.2013 um 14:06 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 12/04/2013 12:04, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> >> Or actually, if you want to avoid .bdrv_drain for now, the patch that I
> >> started when I thought a bit about this, had a default
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/04/2013 12:04, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>> Or actually, if you want to avoid .bdrv_drain for now, the patch that I
>> started when I thought a bit about this, had a default .bdrv_drain
>> implementation that just forwarded the request to
Il 12/04/2013 12:04, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> Or actually, if you want to avoid .bdrv_drain for now, the patch that I
> started when I thought a bit about this, had a default .bdrv_drain
> implementation that just forwarded the request to bs->file if it wasn't
> implemented by a block driver. For t
Am 12.04.2013 um 11:49 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:02:02AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 11.04.2013 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > Here's my entry to the "let's get rid of io_flush()" effort. It's based
> > > on
> > > Paolo's insight about bdrv
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:02:02AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 11.04.2013 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > Here's my entry to the "let's get rid of io_flush()" effort. It's based on
> > Paolo's insight about bdrv_drain_all() that the block layer already has a
> > tracked_requests li
Am 11.04.2013 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Here's my entry to the "let's get rid of io_flush()" effort. It's based on
> Paolo's insight about bdrv_drain_all() that the block layer already has a
> tracked_requests list. io_flush() is redundant since the block layer already
> knows i
Here's my entry to the "let's get rid of io_flush()" effort. It's based on
Paolo's insight about bdrv_drain_all() that the block layer already has a
tracked_requests list. io_flush() is redundant since the block layer already
knows if requests are pending.
The point of this effort is to simplify
