On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 01:26:41PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 30/10/16 22:11, David Gibson wrote:
> > The 'cpu_version' field in PowerPCCPU is badly named. It's named after the
> > 'cpu-version' device tree property where it is advertised, but that meaning
> > may not be obvious in mo
On 30.10.2016 12:11, David Gibson wrote:
> The 'cpu_version' field in PowerPCCPU is badly named. It's named after the
> 'cpu-version' device tree property where it is advertised, but that meaning
> may not be obvious in most places it appears.
>
> Worse, it doesn't even really correspond to that
On 30/10/16 22:11, David Gibson wrote:
> The 'cpu_version' field in PowerPCCPU is badly named. It's named after the
> 'cpu-version' device tree property where it is advertised, but that meaning
> may not be obvious in most places it appears.
>
> Worse, it doesn't even really correspond to that de
The 'cpu_version' field in PowerPCCPU is badly named. It's named after the
'cpu-version' device tree property where it is advertised, but that meaning
may not be obvious in most places it appears.
Worse, it doesn't even really correspond to that device tree property. The
property contains either
