On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:51:00 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:32:08 +0530
> Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:01:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:20 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
[...]
> > Is
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:32:08 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:01:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:20 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > We've recently added a new device_add based cpu hotplug
> > >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:01:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:20 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > We've recently added a new device_add based cpu hotplug
> > implementation, with the spapr machine type being the first user. In
> > order to overcome the limitations of
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 04:01:18PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:20 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > We've recently added a new device_add based cpu hotplug
> > implementation, with the spapr machine type being the first user. In
> > order to overcome the limitations of
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 19:19:20 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> We've recently added a new device_add based cpu hotplug
> implementation, with the spapr machine type being the first user. In
> order to overcome the limitations of the old cpu_add interface, it
> works very differently. That's going
We've recently added a new device_add based cpu hotplug
implementation, with the spapr machine type being the first user. In
order to overcome the limitations of the old cpu_add interface, it
works very differently. That's going to require a new interface in
libvirt to properly use the new