On 26 February 2014 09:17, alvise rigo wrote:
> This was a polite way to alter the value of the register in order to not
> fail the
> migration when KVM migrates a value different from the TCG one.
> KVM in particular does not set the irq bit while TCG does.
You mean the "interrupt controller" bi
This was a polite way to alter the value of the register in order to not
fail the
migration when KVM migrates a value different from the TCG one.
KVM in particular does not set the irq bit while TCG does.
alvise
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 February 2014 16:52,
On 25 February 2014 16:52, Alvise Rigo wrote:
> Since the irq bit seems to not be updated, exclude it from the check done
> while copying data during migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
> ---
> target-arm/cpu.c | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Since the irq bit seems to not be updated, exclude it from the check done
while copying data during migration.
Signed-off-by: Alvise Rigo
---
target-arm/cpu.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-arm/cpu.c b/target-arm/cpu.c
index 6e7
