On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 08:37:43PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
On 12.06.2015 12:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
+void block_job_txn_add_job(BlockJobTxn *txn, BlockJob *job)
+{
+if (!txn) {
+return;
+}
Do you plan on making use of this case? I'm asking because while I'm usually
in
On 12.06.2015 12:09, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Sometimes block jobs must execute as a transaction group. Finishing
jobs wait until all other jobs are ready to complete successfully.
Failure or cancellation of one job cancels the other jobs in the group.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
Sometimes block jobs must execute as a transaction group. Finishing
jobs wait until all other jobs are ready to complete successfully.
Failure or cancellation of one job cancels the other jobs in the group.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@redhat.com
---
blockjob.c| 160
