On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 02:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 10:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Old kernels (< 3.1) handle hvcX devices different in different parts.
>>> Sometime the kernel assumes that the hvc device numbers
On 10/16/2013 02:03 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Old kernels (< 3.1) handle hvcX devices different in different parts.
>> Sometime the kernel assumes that the hvc device numbers start from zero
>> and if there is just one hvc, then it is hvc0.
On 10/15/2013 10:50 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Old kernels (< 3.1) handle hvcX devices different in different parts.
Sometime the kernel assumes that the hvc device numbers start from zero
and if there is just one hvc, then it is hvc0.
However kernel's add_preferred_console() uses the very
Old kernels (< 3.1) handle hvcX devices different in different parts.
Sometime the kernel assumes that the hvc device numbers start from zero
and if there is just one hvc, then it is hvc0.
However kernel's add_preferred_console() uses the very last byte of
the VTY's "reg" property as an hvc number
