On (Sun) 01 Jul 2012 [23:06:36], Paul Brook wrote:
> > This series depends on my QOM -object series that I just posted.
> >
> > In Amit's thread on virtio-rng, danpb mentioned that we really ought to
> > have a proper RNG backend infrastructure and of course he's correct on
> > that.
> >
> > Now
> This series depends on my QOM -object series that I just posted.
>
> In Amit's thread on virtio-rng, danpb mentioned that we really ought to
> have a proper RNG backend infrastructure and of course he's correct on
> that.
>
> Now that we have QOM, I wanted to demonstrate how we can use QOM to
>
This series depends on my QOM -object series that I just posted.
In Amit's thread on virtio-rng, danpb mentioned that we really ought to have a
proper RNG backend infrastructure and of course he's correct on that.
Now that we have QOM, I wanted to demonstrate how we can use QOM to construct a
com
In Amit's thread on virtio-rng, danpb mentioned that we really ought to have a
proper RNG backend infrastructure and of course he's correct on that.
Now that we have QOM, I wanted to demonstrate how we can use QOM to construct a
complete backend without adding any new infrastructure.
For this RFC
