mu-devel@nongnu.org; Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/13] VT-d replay and misc cleanup
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 04:42:50PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
> series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
> lack there are mostly the following:
>
> (1) VFIO got duplicated IOTLB notifications due to
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 04:42:50PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
> > series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
> > lack there are mostly the
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
> series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
> lack there are mostly the following:
>
> (1) VFIO got duplicated IOTLB notifications due to
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
> series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
> lack there are mostly the following:
>
> (1) VFIO got duplicated IOTLB notifications due to
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 06:36:15PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
> series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
> lack there are mostly the following:
>
> (1) VFIO got duplicated IOTLB notifications due to
This RFC series is a continue work for Aviv B.D.'s vfio enablement
series with vt-d. Aviv has done a great job there, and what we still
lack there are mostly the following:
(1) VFIO got duplicated IOTLB notifications due to splitted VT-d IOMMU
memory region.
(2) VT-d still haven't provide a
