On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:07:34PM -0300, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 09:36 +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > This case just snoop tftp packet through tcpdump, it depends on public dhcp
> > server, better to test it through dnsmasq.
>
> It would be a good idea to have an alte
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 09:36 +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> This case just snoop tftp packet through tcpdump, it depends on public dhcp
> server, better to test it through dnsmasq.
It would be a good idea to have an alternate implementation using
dnsmasq, but not urgent.
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
>
This case just snoop tftp packet through tcpdump, it depends on public dhcp
server, better to test it through dnsmasq.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang
Signed-off-by: Amos Kong
---
0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/tests/pxe.py b/client/tests/kvm/tests/pxe
