From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhi...@us.ibm.com>
Changes since v3:
- Compile-tested with and without --enable-rdma is working.
- Updated docs/rdma.txt (included below)
- Merged with latest pull queue from Paolo
- Implemented qemu_ram_foreach_block()
mrhines@mrhinesdev:~/qemu$ git diff --stat master
Makefile.objs | 1 +
arch_init.c | 28 +-
configure | 25 ++
docs/rdma.txt | 190 +++++++++++
exec.c | 21 ++
include/exec/cpu-common.h | 6 +
include/migration/migration.h | 3 +
include/migration/qemu-file.h | 10 +
include/migration/rdma.h | 269 ++++++++++++++++
include/qemu/sockets.h | 1 +
migration-rdma.c | 205 ++++++++++++
migration.c | 19 +-
rdma.c | 1511
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
savevm.c | 172 +++++++++-
util/qemu-sockets.c | 2 +-
15 files changed, 2445 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
QEMUFileRDMA:
==================================
QEMUFileRDMA introduces a couple of new functions:
1. qemu_rdma_get_buffer() (QEMUFileOps rdma_read_ops)
2. qemu_rdma_put_buffer() (QEMUFileOps rdma_write_ops)
These two functions provide an RDMA transport
(not a protocol) without changing the upper-level
users of QEMUFile that depend on a bytstream abstraction.
In order to provide the same bytestream interface
for RDMA, we use SEND messages instead of sockets.
The operations themselves and the protocol built on
top of QEMUFile used throughout the migration
process do not change whatsoever.
An infiniband SEND message is the standard ibverbs
message used by applications of infiniband hardware.
The only difference between a SEND message and an RDMA
message is that SEND message cause completion notifications
to be posted to the completion queue (CQ) on the
infiniband receiver side, whereas RDMA messages (used
for pc.ram) do not (to behave like an actual DMA).
Messages in infiniband require two things:
1. registration of the memory that will be transmitted
2. (SEND only) work requests to be posted on both
sides of the network before the actual transmission
can occur.
RDMA messages much easier to deal with. Once the memory
on the receiver side is registed and pinned, we're
basically done. All that is required is for the sender
side to start dumping bytes onto the link.
SEND messages require more coordination because the
receiver must have reserved space (using a receive
work request) on the receive queue (RQ) before QEMUFileRDMA
can start using them to carry all the bytes as
a transport for migration of device state.
After the initial connection setup (migration-rdma.c),
this coordination starts by having both sides post
a single work request to the RQ before any users
of QEMUFile are activated.
Once an initial receive work request is posted,
we have a put_buffer()/get_buffer() implementation
that looks like this:
Logically:
qemu_rdma_get_buffer():
1. A user on top of QEMUFile calls ops->get_buffer(),
which calls us.
2. We transmit an empty SEND to let the sender know that
we are *ready* to receive some bytes from QEMUFileRDMA.
These bytes will come in the form of a another SEND.
3. Before attempting to receive that SEND, we post another
RQ work request to replace the one we just used up.
4. Block on a CQ event channel and wait for the SEND
to arrive.
5. When the send arrives, librdmacm will unblock us
and we can consume the bytes (described later).
qemu_rdma_put_buffer():
1. A user on top of QEMUFile calls ops->put_buffer(),
which calls us.
2. Block on the CQ event channel waiting for a SEND
from the receiver to tell us that the receiver
is *ready* for us to transmit some new bytes.
3. When the "ready" SEND arrives, librdmacm will
unblock us and we immediately post a RQ work request
to replace the one we just used up.
4. Now, we can actually deliver the bytes that
put_buffer() wants and return.
NOTE: This entire sequents of events is designed this
way to mimic the operations of a bytestream and is not
typical of an infiniband application. (Something like MPI
would not 'ping-pong' messages like this and would not
block after every request, which would normally defeat
the purpose of using zero-copy infiniband in the first place).
Finally, how do we handoff the actual bytes to get_buffer()?
Again, because we're trying to "fake" a bytestream abstraction
using an analogy not unlike individual UDP frames, we have
to hold on to the bytes received from SEND in memory.
Each time we get to "Step 5" above for get_buffer(),
the bytes from SEND are copied into a local holding buffer.
Then, we return the number of bytes requested by get_buffer()
and leave the remaining bytes in the buffer until get_buffer()
comes around for another pass.
If the buffer is empty, then we follow the same steps
listed above for qemu_rdma_get_buffer() and block waiting
for another SEND message to re-fill the buffer.
Migration of pc.ram:
===============================
At the beginning of the migration, (migration-rdma.c),
the sender and the receiver populate the list of RAMBlocks
to be registered with each other into a structure.
Then, using a single SEND message, they exchange this
structure with each other, to be used later during the
iteration of main memory. This structure includes a list
of all the RAMBlocks, their offsets and lengths.
Main memory is not migrated with SEND infiniband
messages, but is instead migrated with RDMA infiniband
messages.
Messages are migrated in "chunks" (about 64 pages right now).
Chunk size is not dynamic, but it could be in a future
implementation.
When a total of 64 pages (or a flush()) are aggregated,
the memory backed by the chunk on the sender side is
registered with librdmacm and pinned in memory.
After pinning, an RDMA send is generated and tramsmitted
for the entire chunk.
Error-handling:
===============================
Infiniband has what is called a "Reliable, Connected"
link (one of 4 choices). This is the mode in which
we use for RDMA migration.
If a *single* message fails,
the decision is to abort the migration entirely and
cleanup all the RDMA descriptors and unregister all
the memory.
After cleanup, the Virtual Machine is returned to normal
operation the same way that would happen if the TCP
socket is broken during a non-RDMA based migration.
USAGE
===============================
Compiling:
$ ./configure --enable-rdma --target-list=x86_64-softmmu
$ make
Command-line on the Source machine AND Destination:
$ virsh qemu-monitor-command --hmp --cmd "migrate_set_speed 40g" # or whatever
is the MAX of your RDMA device
Finally, perform the actual migration:
$ virsh migrate domain rdma:xx.xx.xx.xx:port
PERFORMANCE
===================
Using a 40gbps infinband link performing a worst-case stress test:
RDMA Throughput With $ stress --vm-bytes 1024M --vm 1 --vm-keep
Approximately 30 gpbs (little better than the paper)
1. Average worst-case throughput
TCP Throughput With $ stress --vm-bytes 1024M --vm 1 --vm-keep
2. Approximately 8 gpbs (using IPOIB IP over Infiniband)
Average downtime (stop time) ranges between 28 and 33 milliseconds.
An *exhaustive* paper (2010) shows additional performance details
linked on the QEMU wiki:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/RDMALiveMigration
