On 11/08/2015 13:11, Frederic Konrad wrote:
> On 11/08/2015 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 10/08/2015 17:27, fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
>>> @@ -583,5 +587,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>>> /* fail safe : never use current_cpu outside cpu_exec() */
>>> current_cpu = NU
On 11/08/2015 12:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 10/08/2015 17:27, fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
@@ -583,5 +587,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
/* fail safe : never use current_cpu outside cpu_exec() */
current_cpu = NULL;
+tcg_cpu_allow_execution(cpu);
I don't think this i
On 10/08/2015 17:27, fred.kon...@greensocs.com wrote:
> @@ -583,5 +587,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>
> /* fail safe : never use current_cpu outside cpu_exec() */
> current_cpu = NULL;
> +tcg_cpu_allow_execution(cpu);
I don't think this is correct; safe_work_pending() is a mu
From: KONRAD Frederic
This flag indicates the state of the VCPU thread:
* 0 if the VCPU is allowed to execute code.
* 1 if the VCPU is currently executing code.
* -1 if the VCPU is not allowed to execute code.
This allows to atomically check and run safe work or check and continue the TCG
