On 16/07/2019 15:35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
anyway as the guest OS always decides where to put it.
This totally depends on https://patchwork.o
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:20:56AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 16/07/2019 07.35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
> > image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
> > anyway as the guest OS always
On 18/07/2019 17:20, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 16/07/2019 07.35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
anyway as the guest OS always decides where to put it.
Th
On 16/07/2019 07.35, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
> image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
> anyway as the guest OS always decides where to put it.
>
> This totally depends on https://patchw
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190716053522.78813-1-...@ozlabs.ru/
Hi,
This series failed build test on FreeBSD host. Please find the details below.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
# Testing script will be invoked under the git checkout with
# HEAD pointing to a commit that has
SLOF implements one itself so let's remove it from QEMU. It is one less
image and simpler setup as the RTAS blob never stays in its initial place
anyway as the guest OS always decides where to put it.
This totally depends on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1132440/ ,
hence RFC.
Signed-off-by:
