On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 16:37, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 14:51, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
Also a bit in l2 offset to say there is no l2 table cause all
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Frediano Ziglio fredd...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/27 Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com:
This is the second draft for what I think could be added when we increase
qcow2's
version number to 3. This includes points that have been made by several
people
over the past
Am 12.10.2011 14:51, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
Also a bit in l2 offset to say there is no l2 table cause all
clusters in l2 are contiguous so we avoid entirely l2. Obviously this
require an optimization step to detect or create such condition.
There are several reserved L1 entry bits which
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 14:51, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
Also a bit in l2 offset to say there is no l2 table cause all
clusters in l2 are contiguous so we avoid entirely l2. Obviously this
require an optimization step to detect or create
Am 12.10.2011 16:37, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com wrote:
Am 12.10.2011 14:51, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
Also a bit in l2 offset to say there is no l2 table cause all
clusters in l2 are contiguous so we avoid entirely l2. Obviously this
2011/6/27 Kevin Wolf kw...@redhat.com:
This is the second draft for what I think could be added when we increase
qcow2's
version number to 3. This includes points that have been made by several
people
over the past few months. We're probably not going to implement this next
week,
but I
This is the second draft for what I think could be added when we increase
qcow2's
version number to 3. This includes points that have been made by several people
over the past few months. We're probably not going to implement this next week,
but I think it's important to get discussions started
