On 2015/2/4 0:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 02/03/15 17:19, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:37:11 +0800
>> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>
>>> XDST points to other tables except FACS & DSDT.
>> Is there any reason to use XSDT instead of RSDT?
>> If ACPI tables are below 4Gb which probably wou
On 02/03/15 17:19, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:37:11 +0800
> Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>> XDST points to other tables except FACS & DSDT.
> Is there any reason to use XSDT instead of RSDT?
> If ACPI tables are below 4Gb which probably would
> be the case then RSDT could be used just
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:37:11 +0800
Shannon Zhao wrote:
> XDST points to other tables except FACS & DSDT.
Is there any reason to use XSDT instead of RSDT?
If ACPI tables are below 4Gb which probably would
be the case then RSDT could be used just fine and
we could share more code between x86 and AR
XDST points to other tables except FACS & DSDT.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao
---
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c| 32 +++-
include/hw/acpi/acpi-defs.h |9 +
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/vir
