On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 03:24:43PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 22:03, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
> > For some reason only edge-triggered or enabled level-triggered
> > interrupts would set the pending state of a raised IRQ. This is not in
> > compliance with the specs, which
On 26 September 2013 22:03, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> For some reason only edge-triggered or enabled level-triggered
> interrupts would set the pending state of a raised IRQ. This is not in
> compliance with the specs, which indicate that the pending state is
> separate from the enabled state, wh
For some reason only edge-triggered or enabled level-triggered
interrupts would set the pending state of a raised IRQ. This is not in
compliance with the specs, which indicate that the pending state is
separate from the enabled state, which only controls if a pending
interrupt is actually forwarde
