On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 02:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>
>>> IMO we should use the same mechanism as proposed for other devices:
>>> address_space_map() should grab a reference on the dimm device, and
>>> address_space_unmap() can release it. This wa
On 10/31/2012 02:18 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>
>> IMO we should use the same mechanism as proposed for other devices:
>> address_space_map() should grab a reference on the dimm device, and
>> address_space_unmap() can release it. This way device destruction will
>> be deferred as soon as all de
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 10:06 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
+static void dimm_populate(DimmDevice *s)
+{
+De
On 10/24/2012 10:06 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>> +static void dimm_populate(DimmDevice *s)
>>> +{
>>> +DeviceState *dev= (DeviceState*)s;
>>> +MemoryRegion *new
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Vasilis Liaskovitis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:2
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:15:17PM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> >>> +static void dimm_populate(Dimm
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:06 AM, liu ping fan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>>> +static void dimm_populate(DimmDevice *s)
>>> +{
>>> +DeviceState *dev= (DeviceState*)s;
>>> +MemoryR
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>> +static void dimm_populate(DimmDevice *s)
>> +{
>> +DeviceState *dev= (DeviceState*)s;
>> +MemoryRegion *new = NULL;
>> +
>> +new = g_malloc(sizeof(MemoryRe
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:17:21PM +0200, Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> +static void dimm_populate(DimmDevice *s)
> +{
> +DeviceState *dev= (DeviceState*)s;
> +MemoryRegion *new = NULL;
> +
> +new = g_malloc(sizeof(MemoryRegion));
> +memory_region_init_ram(new, dev->id, s->size);
> +
At 09/21/2012 07:17 PM, Vasilis Liaskovitis Wrote:
> Each hotplug-able memory slot is a DimmDevice. All DimmDevices are attached
> to a new bus called DimmBus. This bus is introduced so that we no longer
> depend on hotplug-capability of main system bus (the main bus does not allow
> hotplugging).
Each hotplug-able memory slot is a DimmDevice. All DimmDevices are attached
to a new bus called DimmBus. This bus is introduced so that we no longer
depend on hotplug-capability of main system bus (the main bus does not allow
hotplugging). The DimmBus should be attached to a chipset Device (i440fx
11 matches
Mail list logo
