On 10/17/17 13:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/10/2017 00:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 13.10.17 at 13:13, wrote:
> >>> To Jan, Andrew, Stefano and Anthony,
> >>>
> >>> what do you think about allowing QEMU to build the entire guest ACP
On 14/10/2017 00:46, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 13.10.17 at 13:13, wrote:
>>> To Jan, Andrew, Stefano and Anthony,
>>>
>>> what do you think about allowing QEMU to build the entire guest ACPI
>>> and letting SeaBIOS to load it? ACPI builder code in
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:53:26PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 10/12/17 17:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 12/10/2017 14:45, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > Basically, QEMU builds two ROMs for guest, /rom@etc/acpi/tables and
> > > /rom@etc/table-loader. The former is unstructured to guest,
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:46:39PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 13.10.17 at 13:13, wrote:
> > > To Jan, Andrew, Stefano and Anthony,
> > >
> > > what do you think about allowing QEMU to build the entire guest ACPI
> > > and letting SeaBIOS
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 13.10.17 at 13:13, wrote:
> > To Jan, Andrew, Stefano and Anthony,
> >
> > what do you think about allowing QEMU to build the entire guest ACPI
> > and letting SeaBIOS to load it? ACPI builder code in hvmloader is
> > still there and just bypassed
>>> On 13.10.17 at 13:13, wrote:
> To Jan, Andrew, Stefano and Anthony,
>
> what do you think about allowing QEMU to build the entire guest ACPI
> and letting SeaBIOS to load it? ACPI builder code in hvmloader is
> still there and just bypassed in this case.
Well, if that can be made work in a n
On 10/13/17 10:44 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:53:26 +0800
> Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>
> > On 10/12/17 17:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > On 12/10/2017 14:45, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > Basically, QEMU builds two ROMs for guest, /rom@etc/acpi/tables and
> > > > /ro
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:53:26 +0800
Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 10/12/17 17:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 12/10/2017 14:45, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > Basically, QEMU builds two ROMs for guest, /rom@etc/acpi/tables and
> > > /rom@etc/table-loader. The former is unstructured to guest, and
On 10/12/17 13:39 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:45:44PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On 10/10/17 12:05 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:15:09AM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > > On 09/11/17 11:52 -0700, Stefano Stabellini
On 10/12/17 17:45 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/10/2017 14:45, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > Basically, QEMU builds two ROMs for guest, /rom@etc/acpi/tables and
> > /rom@etc/table-loader. The former is unstructured to guest, and
> > contains all data of guest ACPI. The latter is a BIOSLinkerLoade
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:45:44PM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 10/10/17 12:05 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:15:09AM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > > On 09/11/17 11:52 -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > CC'ing xen-devel, and the Xen tools and x86 ma
On 12/10/2017 14:45, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Basically, QEMU builds two ROMs for guest, /rom@etc/acpi/tables and
> /rom@etc/table-loader. The former is unstructured to guest, and
> contains all data of guest ACPI. The latter is a BIOSLinkerLoader
> organized as a set of commands, which direct the g
On 10/10/17 12:05 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:15:09AM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > On 09/11/17 11:52 -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > CC'ing xen-devel, and the Xen tools and x86 maintainers.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > >
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:15:09AM +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 09/11/17 11:52 -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > CC'ing xen-devel, and the Xen tools and x86 maintainers.
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:41:47 +0800
> > > Haozhong Zhang wrote:
On 09/11/17 11:52 -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> CC'ing xen-devel, and the Xen tools and x86 maintainers.
>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:41:47 +0800
> > Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > This is the QEMU part patches that works with the associated Xen
CC'ing xen-devel, and the Xen tools and x86 maintainers.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:41:47 +0800
> Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>
> > This is the QEMU part patches that works with the associated Xen
> > patches to enable vNVDIMM support for Xen HVM domains. Xen re
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 12:41:47 +0800
Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> This is the QEMU part patches that works with the associated Xen
> patches to enable vNVDIMM support for Xen HVM domains. Xen relies on
> QEMU to build guest NFIT and NVDIMM namespace devices, and allocate
> guest address space for vNVDIM
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC QEMU PATCH v3 00/10] Implement vNVDIMM for Xen HVM
guest
Message-id: 20170911044157.15403-1-haozhong.zh...@intel.com
Type: series
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
This is the QEMU part patches that works with the associated Xen
patches to enable vNVDIMM support for Xen HVM domains. Xen relies on
QEMU to build guest NFIT and NVDIMM namespace devices, and allocate
guest address space for vNVDIMM devices.
All patches can be found at
Xen: https://github.com/
19 matches
Mail list logo
