On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:03:59AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
[...]
> >> I mentioned in the cover letter that this needs to be changed once a
> >> CPUClass-level realizefn is introduced. I could introduce a no-op
> >> realizefn there and do the regular store+call.
> >
> > That was the semantics
Am 17.01.2013 00:43, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 16.01.2013 17:04, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:32:48AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> [...]
@@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:52:47PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 16.01.2013 17:04, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:32:48AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > [...]
> >> @@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass
> >> *oc, void *data)
> >> {
>
Am 16.01.2013 17:04, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:32:48AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> [...]
>> @@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
>> void *data)
>> {
>> X86CPUClass *xcc = X86_CPU_CLASS(oc);
>> CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLAS
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 06:32:48AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2247,6 +2247,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_common_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
> void *data)
> {
> X86CPUClass *xcc = X86_CPU_CLASS(oc);
> CPUClass *cc = CPU_CLASS(oc);
> +DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
> +
>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 06:32:48 +0100
Andreas Färber wrote:
> Adapt the signature of x86_cpu_realize(), hook up to
> DeviceClass::realize and set realized = true in cpu_x86_init().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost
> Cc: Igor Mammedov
Reviewed-By: Igor Mammedov
> ---
> t
Adapt the signature of x86_cpu_realize(), hook up to
DeviceClass::realize and set realized = true in cpu_x86_init().
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber
Cc: Eduardo Habkost
Cc: Igor Mammedov
---
target-i386/cpu-qom.h |3 ---
target-i386/cpu.c |7 +--
target-i386/helper.c |2 +-
