On 02/07/16 03:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/27/2016 02:20 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
>> On 03/06/16 23:40, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
>>> index 1694ce9..12e04c9 100644
>>> --- a/cpus.c
>>> +++ b/cpus.c
>>> @@ -1208,9 +1208,29 @@ static int tcg_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
On 06/27/2016 02:20 PM, Sergey Fedorov wrote:
On 03/06/16 23:40, Alex Bennée wrote:
diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index 1694ce9..12e04c9 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -1208,9 +1208,29 @@ static int tcg_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
return ret;
}
+/* Single-threaded TCG
+ *
+ * In the singl
On 03/06/16 23:40, Alex Bennée wrote:
> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
> index 1694ce9..12e04c9 100644
> --- a/cpus.c
> +++ b/cpus.c
> @@ -1208,9 +1208,29 @@ static int tcg_cpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/* Single-threaded TCG
> + *
> + * In the single-threaded case each vCPU
Currently we rely on the side effect of the main loop grabbing the
iothread_mutex to give any long running basic block chains a kick to
ensure the next vCPU is scheduled. As this code is being re-factored and
rationalised we now do it explicitly here.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
---
v2
- re-bas
