Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator

2013-10-15 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:14:36 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > > What is the state of the qemu side patches btw? > > I've them ready but they conflict with you 1Tb in e820 RFC, > > I can post relevant patches as soon as we agree on this topic. > > May I pick up your patch and post it alon

Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator

2013-10-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > > What is the state of the qemu side patches btw? > I've them ready but they conflict with you 1Tb in e820 RFC, > I can post relevant patches as soon as we agree on this topic. > May I pick up your patch and post it along with pcimem64-start patches? Yes, makes sense it just pick it into

Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator

2013-10-14 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hi, > > > But RamSizeOver4G still doesn't allow correctly place PCI window if large > > > amount of memory present/reserved. > > BTW: I don't think it's good practice to change semantics of an old > > interface > > in general. It's less confusing to leave old interface as is (obsoleting it > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator

2013-10-13 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 08:19:16PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:33:19 +0200 > Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:46:09 +0300 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:59:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v2] map 64-bit PCI BARs at location provided by emulator

2013-10-13 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:33:19 +0200 Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 19:46:09 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:23:28PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 18:59:20 +0300 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct