durrant=citrix@nongnu.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Stefano Stabellini
> > > Sent: 19 June 2013 14:53
> > > To: Ian Campbell
> > > Cc: Paolo Bonzini; Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xen.org; qemu-
> > > de...@nongnu.org; Stefano Stabellini
> > > Subject:
53
> > To: Ian Campbell
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini; Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xen.org; qemu-
> > de...@nongnu.org; Stefano Stabellini
> > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded xen-
> > platform device initialization
> >
> > On Wed,
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 14:55 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com]
> > > Sent: 18 June 2013 20:35
> > > To: Paolo Bonzini
> > > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Paul
n-de...@lists.xen.org; qemu-
> de...@nongnu.org; Stefano Stabellini
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded xen-
> platform device initialization
>
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 19:56 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrot
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com]
> > Sent: 18 June 2013 20:35
> > To: Paolo Bonzini
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Paul Durrant; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> > de...@lists.xen.org; Ian Campbe
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 19:56 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> > > > Bonzini
> > > > Sent: 14 Ju
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> In fact, I wonder if we could just query the qemu which is running to
> provide dom0 itself with qdisk services, at least in the case where the
> guest is configured to use the same version of qemu.
Great idea, that should work.
Il 19/06/2013 10:56, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
> The case with xl is more like your example 5:
Ok, that's what I remembered. :)
> > Example 5: you use "virsh create" to start a VM based on an XML file,
> > rather than "virsh define"+"virsh start" as in examples 1-2. You lose
> > any guarantee tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Campbell
> Sent: 19 June 2013 09:56
> To: Paolo Bonzini
> Cc: Andreas Färber; Stefano Stabellini; Paul Durrant; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded x
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 10:41 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 19/06/2013 10:29, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
> >> > You could check for existence of the pc-i440fx-1.6 machine and infer
> >> > that it is at least v1.6 (might break in some distant future of course
> >> > and for current git commits until
Il 19/06/2013 10:29, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
>> > You could check for existence of the pc-i440fx-1.6 machine and infer
>> > that it is at least v1.6 (might break in some distant future of course
>> > and for current git commits until your changes get merged).
> Actually, this raises an interesting
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Campbell
> Sent: 19 June 2013 09:29
> To: Andreas Färber
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Paolo Bonzini; Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xen.org;
> qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded x
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 23:38 +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.06.2013 21:35, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> > On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 18/06/2013 20:56, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
> >>> xenfv-2.0 is a bad idea, like Paolo wrote, it should be possible to just
> >>> use
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: 18 June 2013 20:35
> To: Paolo Bonzini
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Paul Durrant; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org; Ian Campbell
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcode
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 19:56 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> > > Bonzini
> > > Sent: 14 June 2013 15:58
> > > To: Paul Durrant
> > > Cc: Ian Ca
Am 18.06.2013 21:35, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 18/06/2013 20:56, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
>>> xenfv-2.0 is a bad idea, like Paolo wrote, it should be possible to just
>>> use -M pc for HVM guests and retain -M xenpv for pv guests.
>>>
>>> Ho
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 18/06/2013 20:56, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
> >> >
> >> > Ok. I guess we can have the ability to override the machine type in the
> >> > VM config, so you could still kick off an older qemu with a newer libxl
> >> > - but it sounds like the aut
Il 18/06/2013 20:56, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Ok. I guess we can have the ability to override the machine type in the VM
>> > config, so you could still kick off an older qemu with a newer libxl - but
>> > it sounds like the auto-discovery idea is a no-go then.
> xenfv-2.0 is a b
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> > Bonzini
> > Sent: 14 June 2013 15:58
> > To: Paul Durrant
> > Cc: Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> > de...@lists.xen
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Sent: 14 June 2013 15:58
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcode
Il 14/06/2013 10:11, Paul Durrant ha scritto:
> I think we're still going to need -M xenpv, I think; it's quite
> distinct from pc.
Of course! Even more: "-M xenpv" should be reused on ARM.
> I guess we could use -M pc for HVM and gate the
> accel code as you suggest but, if that's the way we're
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Sent: 14 June 2013 14:51
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcode
Il 14/06/2013 06:38, Paul Durrant ha scritto:
I think the right solution for this is to move towards using
the normal "-M pc" machine. libxl can simply use "-M pc
-machine accel=xen -device xen-platform-pv"; older versions
that use the xenfv machine will still work.
qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Stefano Stabellini
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded xen-
> platform device initialization
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> > Bonzini
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonz...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo
> Bonzini
> Sent: 13 June 2013 19:03
> To: Ian Campbell
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; Paul Durrant; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcode
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Campbell
> Sent: 13 June 2013 18:44
> To: Stefano Stabellini
> Cc: Paul Durrant; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Remove hardcoded xen-
> platform device initialization
>
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at
Il 13/06/2013 13:44, Ian Campbell ha scritto:
> On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 18:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
>>> The xen-platform device should be initialized by the Xen toolstack by
>>> passing the appropriate -device argument on the command line.
>>>
>>
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 18:33 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > The xen-platform device should be initialized by the Xen toolstack by
> > passing the appropriate -device argument on the command line.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant
>
> This patch i
28 matches
Mail list logo
